Abstract#

Astronauts who see Earth from space often experience a profound shift in worldview called the Overview Effect. Despite decades of testimony, no one has systematically analyzed what these experiences have in common, how they vary, or what drives them. TORI Stage 1 will apply Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), an established qualitative research method, to build the first comprehensive coded database of Overview Effect accounts from astronaut memoirs, interviews, oral histories, and transcripts. From this IPA foundation, the project will produce a novel structured instrument, the Overview Experience Phenomenological Index (OEPI), that codes each account across experiential dimensions for searchable comparison. The result: an open-access archive, a reusable research instrument, and a peer-reviewed publication, all released under MoonDAO's name as funding partner.

Problem#

The Overview Effect is one of the most cited phenomena in space culture, yet the research base is surprisingly thin. Most existing studies rely on small samples (fewer than 20 participants), use inconsistent definitions, and lack standardized methodology. The most rigorous IPA study to date (Voski, 2020) analyzed just 14 astronaut interviews. Frank White's foundational work identified the phenomenon in 1987, but subsequent empirical follow-up has not kept pace with the growing cultural and commercial significance of the concept.

As commercial spaceflight scales and organizations like MoonDAO pursue lunar settlement, this gap becomes operationally significant. If we are designing missions, habitats, and communities for long-duration spaceflight, we need to understand how viewing Earth from space (or from the lunar surface) transforms people psychologically. The raw data exists in published and archival form. It has simply never been systematically analyzed at scale.

#

Why MoonDAO#

The Senate review asked whether HSP might be the more appropriate organization to fund this work. The answer is that HSP and MoonDAO serve different and complementary roles here.

What HSP brings: Domain expertise, the research framework (TORI), relationships with Frank White and the Overview Effect research community, and the PI's qualifications. HSP is a small nonprofit with limited operational funding. It does not have the budget to fund this stage independently.

What MoonDAO brings: Funding, community scale, open-access infrastructure, and direct mission relevance. MoonDAO has sent people to space. MoonDAO is building toward lunar settlement. MoonDAO's community can actively participate in Stage 1 through bounties (sourcing accounts, translating non-English materials, data visualization). And critically, MoonDAO gets credited as funding partner on all publications and outputs, positioning the DAO as a contributor to legitimate space psychology research.

Why this matters for MoonDAO's mission specifically: Lunar settlement is not just an engineering problem. People living on the Moon will experience the Overview Effect continuously, seeing Earth as a distant object rather than their immediate environment. Understanding the psychological dimensions of that experience, how it varies by distance, duration, and individual openness (the I = D x T x O spectrum framework), is directly relevant to habitat design, crew psychological support, community formation, and long-term wellbeing on the lunar surface. The archival foundation built in Stage 1 is the first step toward that understanding.

Future stages and MoonDAO: TORI is a five-stage research program. Stage 1 (this proposal) is the archival foundation. Stage 2 develops the theoretical framework. Stage 3 involves primary data collection during actual spaceflight, which could directly involve MoonDAO astronaut missions. Stage 4 validates VR as a research and preparation tool, relevant to MoonDAO's community engagement. Stage 5 produces the comprehensive literature synthesis. This proposal is the low-cost, high-leverage entry point that seeds the entire program.

#

Solution#

Overview#

TORI Stage 1 is a focused archival research project. It collects, codes, and analyzes first-person astronaut accounts of the Overview Effect using an established qualitative methodology (IPA), then structures the findings into a novel research instrument (the OEPI) and an open-access database.

#

Methodology: Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA)#

IPA is a qualitative research method developed by Jonathan Smith (1996) and widely used in psychology for studying lived experience, particularly transformative, emotionally charged, or identity-shifting events. It is the established standard for this type of inquiry and has been successfully applied to Overview Effect research (Voski, 2020). IPA was chosen over alternatives (thematic analysis, grounded theory) because it preserves the first-person experiential structure of each account rather than reducing it to themes alone.

The IPA process for this project follows four phases:

Phase 1: Corpus Assembly. Systematic collection of first-person Overview Effect accounts from five source categories: (a) published astronaut memoirs and autobiographies, (b) structured and semi-structured interviews in academic literature, (c) NASA Oral History Project transcripts, (d) documentary and media transcripts, and (e) accounts embedded in existing research publications. Target: minimum 150 distinct accounts spanning the full history of human spaceflight, including suborbital commercial flights.

Phase 2: IPA Coding. Each account is read and re-read, then annotated with descriptive, linguistic, and conceptual comments following Smith, Flowers, and Larkin (2009) protocols. Initial noting captures the participant's experiential claims, language use, and implicit meaning. Emergent themes are identified within each account, then clustered into superordinate themes across the corpus.

Phase 3: Cross-Case Analysis and OEPI Development. Superordinate themes from individual accounts are compared across the full corpus to identify convergent and divergent patterns. From this analysis, the project constructs the Overview Experience Phenomenological Index (OEPI), a structured coding instrument that scores each account across empirically derived experiential dimensions. Candidate dimensions (to be confirmed through the IPA process) include: cognitive shift and reframing, affective intensity and valence, self-boundary dissolution, ecological and planetary awareness, temporal and spatial reorientation, identity transformation and integration, and archetypal or numinous content.

Phase 4: Contextual Variable Analysis. Coded accounts are cross-referenced against contextual metadata: mission type (suborbital, LEO, lunar), flight duration, era of spaceflight, crew demographics, and (where available) astronaut self-reported openness. This analysis tests the Overview Effect spectrum framework (I = D x T x O) against the archival record.

#

Technical Infrastructure#

Qualitative analysis software: ATLAS.ti (cloud education subscription) for systematic coding, annotation, and theme management across the full corpus. If budget constraints require it, Taguette (free, open-source, published in the Journal of Open Source Software) provides core tagging and coding functionality sufficient for IPA work and has been used in peer-reviewed qualitative research across multiple disciplines.

Intercoder reliability: A subset of accounts (minimum 20%) will be independently coded by a second researcher. Agreement will be measured using Cohen's kappa, targeting 0.70 or higher for substantial agreement (consistent with the Voski 2020 benchmark of 0.61).

Database architecture: The OEPI-coded database will be hosted as an open-access, searchable resource. Each entry includes: source metadata, full IPA annotations, OEPI dimension scores, and contextual variables. The database structure will be documented for community reuse and extension.

#

Relationship to MoonDAO's OECP#

The existing Overview Effect Comparison Project focuses on experiential comparison: sending people to space and measuring before/after outcomes. TORI Stage 1 is complementary. It builds the empirical baseline that makes comparison studies more rigorous and interpretable by establishing what patterns already exist in the historical record. The OEPI instrument could also be applied to OECP data in future phases.

#

Benefits#

MoonDAO is credited as funding partner on all publications and the open-access database, positioning the DAO in legitimate space psychology research.

The OEPI instrument and database are reusable assets. Other researchers (and MoonDAO's own future projects) can build on them without starting from scratch.

Stage 1 is specifically designed for community participation: MoonDAO members can contribute through bounties for sourcing obscure accounts, translating non-English materials, and building data visualizations.

The research directly informs MoonDAO's lunar settlement mission by establishing how the Overview Effect varies with distance, duration, and context, the exact variables that change when you move from LEO to the Moon.

Establishes a research pipeline: Stage 1 seeds federal and foundation grant applications for later stages, multiplying the impact of MoonDAO's initial investment.

Peer-reviewed publication elevates MoonDAO's visibility in the academic space sector, opening doors to institutional partnerships.

#

Risks#

Risk: Access to archival materials may be restricted or incomplete. Mitigation: The PI has existing relationships with NASA history offices and key figures in the Overview Effect community, including Frank White, who originated the concept and chairs HSP's Board. Multiple redundant source categories (five total) ensure coverage even if individual sources are unavailable.

Risk: Qualitative research may face credibility skepticism. Mitigation: IPA is an established, peer-reviewed methodology with published protocols (Smith et al., 2009). The Voski (2020) study provides direct precedent for IPA applied to Overview Effect accounts. Intercoder reliability checks and transparent documentation address rigor concerns.

Risk: The OEPI may not capture the full dimensionality of the experience. Mitigation: The OEPI dimensions emerge from the IPA process rather than being imposed a priori. The instrument is explicitly designed to be iterative and extensible as the corpus grows.

Risk: Timeline slippage. Mitigation: The project is scoped conservatively. Corpus assembly is the most time-intensive component and has the largest share of the timeline. Weekly Discord updates will surface issues early.

#

Objectives#

Objective #1: Build the first comprehensive, IPA-coded research database of Overview Effect accounts and produce the Overview Experience Phenomenological Index (OEPI) as a reusable research instrument.

Key Results for Objective #1:

Minimum 150 distinct astronaut/spacefarer accounts collected from at least 5 source categories.

Full IPA coding completed following Smith, Flowers, and Larkin (2009) protocols.

OEPI instrument developed with empirically derived experiential dimensions and documented scoring criteria.

Intercoder reliability achieved at Cohen's kappa of 0.70 or higher on a minimum 20% subset.

Searchable, open-access database completed and hosted, with MoonDAO credited as funding partner.

One peer-reviewed manuscript submitted to a recognized journal (target: Acta Astronautica, Psychology of Consciousness, or equivalent).

Member(s) responsible: Jason D. Batt, Ph.D. (Project Lead, Principal Investigator)

#

TORI Five-Stage Research Architecture#

This proposal covers Stage 1 only. The full TORI program spans five stages, each building on the previous:

Stage 1 (this proposal): Archival Foundation. IPA-based analysis of existing accounts. Produces the OEPI and open-access database. Estimated cost: ~$3,700 (MoonDAO funded).

Stage 2: Theoretical Framework. Multi-lens integration across neurological, psychological, and depth psychology domains. Develops testable hypotheses from Stage 1 findings.

Stage 3: Primary Data Collection. Prospective measurement during actual spaceflight with real-time neurophysiological monitoring. This stage could directly involve MoonDAO astronaut missions.

Stage 4: VR Correlation Studies. Validates virtual reality as analog and preparation tool. Directly relevant to MoonDAO's community engagement and ORTY-style programming.

Stage 5: Literature Synthesis. Comprehensive mapping of the Overview Effect research ecosystem with indexed bibliography.

Stage 1 is the low-cost entry point. It produces immediately usable outputs (database, instrument, publication) while seeding grant applications for the larger, more expensive stages. The total five-stage program is modeled at $5.4M to $7.9M over five years. MoonDAO's investment here provides outsized leverage.

Team (Table A)#

Team Bio

Jason D. Batt, Ph.D. Director of Research at The Human Space Program (HSP), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit focused on the Overview Effect and ethical human expansion into space. Ph.D. in Depth Psychology (Pacifica Graduate Institute). Dissertation: The Stellar Furnace of the Collective Soul, which frames space travel as a catalyst for mythological and psychological transformation, with Frank White (originator of the Overview Effect concept) as external reader. Associate Editor, Space Philosophy Journal. Developer of the TORI five-stage research framework and the Overview Effect spectrum model (I = D x T x O). Links: thehumanspaceprogram.com | jbatt.com

Timeline (Table B)#

Deadline: End of Q3 2026 (approximately 4 months from approval).

Budget (Table C)#

All costs in USD. Funding received in ETH or MOONEY at current prices at time of transaction.

Note on Intellectual Property: All research outputs (OEPI instrument, database, codebook, publications) will be released as open-access resources with MoonDAO credited as funding partner. No IP-NFTs are being created. The value accrues to MoonDAO and the broader space community through open knowledge and reusable research infrastructure.